Český finanční a účetní časopis 2026(1):45-64 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cfuc.629

EU TAXONOMY IN SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING - A CASE STUDY

Katarzyna Chłapek, Sylwia Krajewska, Pola Filipowicz

The objective of this study is to examine sustainability reporting in relation to the EU Taxonomy (EU 2020/852). Three research questions were formulated: to what extent does the audited entity report in accordance with the EU Taxonomy; what are its percentages of investment income and expenses (CapEx) and operating expenses (OpEx), and what challenges did it face in reporting in accordance with the EU Taxonomy. To achieve this objective and address the research questions, the article employs a critical analysis of source literature, legal acts, and a hermeneutic method as well as a case study. The findings indicate that sustainability reporting is based on an extensive and highly diverse regulatory framework. At the same time, the empirical analysis reveals that the required KPIs related to revenue, CapEx, and OpEx are not presented in a fully comprehensive manner. The originality of this article lies in its attempt to assess the extent to which sustainability report disclosures comply with the EU Taxonomy, considering an entity subject to both optional and subsequently mandatory reporting requirements during the examined period.

Klíčová slova: EU taxonomy, sustainability reporting, ESG, technical screening criteria, minimum guarantees

The objective of this study is to examine sustainability reporting in relation to the EU Taxonomy (EU 2020/852). Three research questions were formulated: to what extent does the audited entity report in accordance with the EU Taxonomy; what are its percentages of investment income and expenses (CapEx) and operating expenses (OpEx), and what challenges did it face in reporting in accordance with the EU Taxonomy. To achieve this objective and address the research questions, the article employs a critical analysis of source literature, legal acts, and a hermeneutic method as well as a case study. The findings indicate that sustainability reporting is based on an extensive and highly diverse regulatory framework. At the same time, the empirical analysis reveals that the required KPIs related to revenue, CapEx, and OpEx are not presented in a fully comprehensive manner. The originality of this article lies in its attempt to assess the extent to which sustainability report disclosures comply with the EU Taxonomy, considering an entity subject to both optional and subsequently mandatory reporting requirements during the examined period

Klasifikace JEL: G38, M41, Q56

Zveřejněno: 23. květen 2026  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chłapek, K., Krajewska, S., & Filipowicz, P. (2026). EU TAXONOMY IN SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING - A CASE STUDY. Český finanční a účetní časopis2026(1), 45-64. doi: 10.18267/j.cfuc.629
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Atea. (2023). Atea annual report 2023. https://www.atea.com/media/quubhnul/atea-annual-report-2024.pdf
  2. Bednarek, J. (Ed.). (2023). ESG - przewodnik po regulacjach prawnych. Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.
  3. Buk, H. (2024). Użyteczność taksonomii Unii Europejskiej w zakresie zrównoważonego rozwoju na przykładzie przedsiębiorstwa górniczego. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 68(4), 50-60. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  4. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. (n.d.). Company database. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/companies/
  5. Busch, D. (2023). EU sustainable finance disclosure regulation. Capital Markets Law Journal, 18(3), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmad005 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. CD PROJEKT A, CD PROJEKT, Corporate Group, https://www.cdprojekt.com/pl/grupa-kapitalowa/.
  7. CD PROJEKT B, CD PROJEKT Group's Sustainability Report for 2021 (also referred to as Report 2021), https://www.cdprojekt.com/pl/wp-content/uploads-pl/2022/04/raport-zrownowazonego-rozwoju-grupy-cd-projekt-za-2021-interactive.pdf
  8. CD PROJEKT C, CD PROJEKT Group's Sustainability Report for 2022 (also referred to as Report 2022), https://www.cdprojekt.com/pl/wp-content/uploads-pl/2023/03/raport-zrownowazonego-rozwoju-grupy-cd-projekt-za-2022.pdf
  9. CD PROJEKT D, CD PROJEKT Group's Sustainability Report for 2023 (also referred to as Report 2023), https://www.cdprojekt.com/pl/wp-content/uploads-pl/2024/03/raport-zrownowazonego-rozwoju-grupy-cd-projekt-za-2023-r-2.pdf
  10. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2131 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  11. Chłapek, K., Krajewska, S., Guziana, B., & Stronczek, A. (2024). Rola samooceny w kształtowaniu zaangażowania społecznego w kontekście raportowania ESG. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 48(2), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.6241 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  12. COM (2018), Commission Communication of March 8, 2018, "Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth," 97. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0097, accessed on: 16.02.2025.
  13. EU 2014/95/EU, Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2014/95/EU of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU with regard to the disclosure of non-financial information and information on diversity by certain large undertakings and groups.
  14. EU 2022/2464, Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) 2022/2464 of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC, and Directive 2013/34/EU with regard to corporate reporting on sustainable development.
  15. EU 2021/2178, Delegated Regulation of the Commission of 6 July 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/852 by specifying the content and presentation of information on environmentally sustainable economic activities to be disclosed by companies subject to Article 19a or 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU and defining the method to meet this disclosure requirement.
  16. EU 2021/2139, Delegated Regulation of the Commission of 4 June 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/852 by establishing technical criteria for qualifying economic activities that significantly contribute to climate change mitigation or adaptation and ensuring such activities do not significantly harm any of the other environmental objectives, C/2021/2800.
  17. EU 2023/2485, Delegated Regulation 2023/2485 of the Commission of 27 June 2023 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 by establishing additional technical criteria for qualifying economic activities that contribute significantly to climate change mitigation or adaptation and ensure they do not significantly harm any of the other environmental objectives.
  18. EU 2023/2772, Delegated Regulation 2023/2772 of the Commission of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU with regard to sustainability reporting standards.
  19. EU 2020/852, European Parliament and Council Regulation 2020/852 of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investments, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088.
  20. EU 1221/2009, European Parliament and Council, Regulation No 1221/2009 of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation of organizations in the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS), Official Journal of the EU L 342, 22.12.2009.
  21. EY (2024) EU Taxonomy Barometer 2024: Fiscal Year 2023 reporting practices and results. Available at: https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/insights/assurance/documents/ey-gl-eu-taxonomy-barometer-09-2024.pdf
  22. Viñes Fiestas, H. (2023). The EU Taxonomy: Financing the transition through sustainable investing. ICE, Revista de Economía, (932). https://doi.org/10.32796/ice.2023.932.7658 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  23. FINAL REPORT ON MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS. (2022), https://finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-10/221011-sustainable-finance-platform-finance-report-minimum-safeguards_en.pdf.
  24. FOB, FORUM ODPOWIEDZIALNEGO BIZNESU, Sustainable Development Reports Competition, https://raportyzr.pl/informacje-o-konkursie/.
  25. Gortsos, C. (2020). Taxonomy Regulation: More important than just as an element of the Capital Markets Union. EBI Working Papers Series, (80). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3750039 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  26. Gürtürk, A., & Hahn, R. (2021). Navigating the EU Taxonomy: Corporate challenges in classification, data availability, and accounting integration. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 2135-2152.
  27. GRI, GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE, https://www.globalreporting.org/.
  28. Hummel, D., & Bauernhofer, T. (2024). Consequences of sustainability reporting mandates: Evidence from the EU taxonomy regulation. Accounting Forum, 48(3), 374-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2024.2301854 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  29. ILO, International Labour Organization, Declaration of the International Labour Organization on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and Complementary Action, and ILO Conventions Covered by the Declaration, https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/lang--en/index.htm.
  30. Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  31. Madsen, L., & Madsen, P. (2022). EU Taxonomy Regulation: Compliance obligations and value creation from a Danish perspective. International Financial Law Review. https://www.iflr.com/article/2a647ugfjmjymyf0vs6ps/eu-taxonomy-regulation-compliance-obligations-and-value-creation-from-a-danish-perspective
  32. Marcinkowska, M. (2022). Próby włączenia ryzyka ESG do unijnych regulacji ostrożnościowych dla banków. Bezpieczny Bank, (3(88)), 42. https://doi.org/10.26354/bb.2.3.88.2022 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  33. Miralles Fornés, J. V. (2024). Analysis and evaluation of the impact of CSRD and EU taxonomy in the construction and energy sector in Spain and Sweden. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1903051/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  34. Noakes, S. (1982). An English translation of Emilio Betti's "Teoria generale della interpretazione." Modern Language Studies, 12(4), 35-37. https://doi.org/10.2307/3194528 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  35. Norang, H., Støre-Valen, M., Kvale, N., & Salaj, A. (2023). Norwegian stakeholders' attitudes towards EU taxonomy. Facilities, 41. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-03-2022-0051 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  36. Och, M. (2025). The EU taxonomy regulation and the prevention of greenwashing. In K. Alexander, M. Gargantini, & M. Siri (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of EU sustainable finance: Regulation, supervision and governance (pp. 357-380). Cambridge University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  37. Ostojic, S., Simone, L., Edler, M., & Traverso, M. (2024). How practically applicable are the EU taxonomy criteria for corporates?-An analysis for the electrical industry. Sustainability, 16(4), 1575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041575 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  38. Schütze, F., & Stede, J. (2021). The EU sustainable finance taxonomy and its contribution to climate neutrality. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(1), 128-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.2006129 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  39. Stede, J., Schütze, F., & Wietschel, J. (2020). Wärmemonitor 2019: Klimaziele bei Wohngebäuden trotz sinkender CO₂-Emissionen derzeit außer Reichweite (DIW Wochenbericht 40/2020). DIW Berlin.
  40. Sullivan, R., & Mackenzie, C. (2017). Responsible investment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351283441 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  41. SASB, SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, https://www.sasb.org/.
  42. Temenos, 2023. Temenos Group Annual Report 2023. https://www.temenos.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Temenos-2024-Annual-Report_FINAL.pdf#page=35
  43. UN 2015, United Nations, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), která umožňuje distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.