Český finanční a účetní časopis 2015(3):7-23 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cfuc.447

Is a Full International Accounting Convergence Desirable?

David Procházka
Doc. Ing. David Procházka, Ph.D. - docent; Katedra finančního účetnictví a auditingu, Fakulta financí a účetnictví, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze; nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3; <prochazd@vse.cz>.

Referring to the Convergence Project of IASB and FASB, the paper focuses on an up-to-date issue, whether it is desirable to endeavour for a single global system of financial reporting standards. Albeit a full convergence is achievable both theoretically and practically, economic theory, analytical modelling and empirical accounting studies show that potential benefits of a single global system are lower than its costs. The main restriction on further convergence stems from the variety of informational needs by users of financial statements. To meet this changing demand, information strategies of preparers have to be flexible. One-size-fits-all approach to standard setting undermines the potential of standard setters to comply with the requirements both from users and companies. The quality of financial reporting standards can be only assured if standard setters are exposed to a competition.

Keywords: Accounting convergence; IFRS; US GAAP; Monopoly; Competition.
JEL classification: M41

Published: October 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Procházka, D. (2015). Is a Full International Accounting Convergence Desirable? Czech Financial and Accounting Journal2015(3), 7-23. doi: 10.18267/j.cfuc.447
Download citation

References

  1. Amershi, A. H. - Demski, J. S. - Wolfson, M. A. (1982): Strategic Behavior and Regulation Research in Accounting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1982, roč. 1, č. 1, s. 19-32. Go to original source...
  2. Arrow, K. (1969): The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Nonmarket Allocation. The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditure: the PPB System, 1969, roč. 1, s. 59-73.
  3. Arrow, K. J. (1985): The Potentials and Limits of the Market in Resource Allocation. In: Feiwel, G. R. (ed.): Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare. London, Macmillan Press, 1985. Go to original source...
  4. Ball, R. (1989): The Firm as a Specialist Contracting Intermediary: Application to Accounting and Auditing. Rochester, University of Rochester, 1989.
  5. Ball, R. (1995): Making Accounting More International: Why, How, and How Far Will It Go? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1995, roč. 8, č. 3, s. 19-29. Go to original source...
  6. Ball, R. (2001): Infrastructure Requirements for an Economically Efficient System of Public Financial Reporting and Disclosure. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 2001, roč. 1, č. 1, s. 127-169. Go to original source...
  7. Ball, R. (2006): International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and Cons for Investors. [on-line], Accounting and Business Research, c2006, roč. 36, č. 1, s. 5-27, [cit. 30. 10. 2015], <doi:10.1080/00014788.2006.9730040>. Go to original source...
  8. Ball, R. (2008): What is the Actual Economic Role of Financial Reporting? Accounting Horizons, 2008, roč. 22, č. 4, s. 427-432. Go to original source...
  9. Ball, R. - Kothari, S. P. - Robin, A. (2000): The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2000, roč. 29, č. 1, s. 1-51. Go to original source...
  10. Barth, M. E. (2006): Research, Standard Setting, and Global Financial Reporting. Foundations and Trends in Accounting, 2006, roč. 1, č. 2, s. 71165. Go to original source...
  11. Bertomeu, J. - Cheynel, E. (2013): Toward a Positive Theory of Disclosure Regulation: In Search of Institutional Foundations. Accounting Review, 2013, roč. 88, č. 3, s. 789-824. Go to original source...
  12. Coase, R. H. (1937): The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 1937, roč. 4, č. 16, s. 386-405. Go to original source...
  13. Daske, H. - Hail, L. - Leuz, C. - Verdi, R. (2013): Adopting a Label: Heterogeneity in the Economic Consequences around IAS/IFRS Adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 2013, roč. 51, č. 3, s. 495-547. Go to original source...
  14. Den Hertog, J. (1999): General Theories of Regulation. Cheltenham, Edgar, 1999.
  15. Ding, Y. - Hope, O. - Jeanjean, T. - Stolowy, H. (2007): Differences between Domestic Accounting Standards and IAS: Measurement, Determinants and Implications. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2007, roč. 26, č. 1, s. 1-38. Go to original source...
  16. Dye, R. A. - Sunder, S. (2001): Why Not Allow FASB and IASB Standards to Complete in the U. S.? Accounting Horizons, 2001, roč. 15, č. 3, s. 257-271. Go to original source...
  17. Forst, A. (2014): IFRS Implementation in the European Union and the Survival of Accounting Families. Advances in Accounting, 2014, roč. 30, č. 1, s. 187-195. Go to original source...
  18. Frank, R. H. (2008): Microeconomics and Behavior. Boston, McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2008.
  19. Gipper, B. - Lombardi, B. J. - Skinner, D. J. (2013): The Politics of Accounting Standard-Setting: A Review of Empirical Research. Australian Journal of Management, 2013, roč. 38, č. 3, s. 523-551. Go to original source...
  20. Gonedes, N. J. - Dopuch, N. (1974): Capital Market Equilibrium, Information Production, and Selecting Accounting Techniques: Theoretical Framework and Review of Empirical Work. Journal of Accounting Research, 1974. roč. 12, č. Studies on Financial Accounting Objectives, s. 48-129. Go to original source...
  21. Gordon, R. H. - Bovenberg, A. L. (1996): Why Is Capital So Immobile Internationally? Possible Explanations and Implications for Capital Income Taxation. The American Economic Review, 1996, roč. 86, č. 5, s. 1057-1075.
  22. Hayek, F. A. (1945): The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review, 1945, roč. 35, č. 4, s. 519-530.
  23. Kothari, S. P. - Ramanna, K. - Skinner, D. J. (2010): Implications for GAAP from an Analysis of Positive Research in Accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2010, roč. 50, č. 2-3, s. 246-286. Go to original source...
  24. Krueger, A. O. (1974): The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society. The American Economic Review, 1974, roč. 64, č. 3, s. 291-303.
  25. Kvaal, E. - Nobes, C. (2010): International Differences in IFRS Policy Choice: A Research Note. Accounting and Business Research, 2010, roč. 40, č. 2, s. 173-187. Go to original source...
  26. Kvaal, E. - Nobes, C. (2012): IFRS Policy Changes and the Continuation of National Patterns of IFRS Practice. European Accounting Review, 2012, roč. 21, č. 2, s. 343-371. Go to original source...
  27. Leuz, C. - Wysocki, P. (2008): Economic Consequences of Financial Reporting and Disclosure Regulation: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research. [on-line], New York, Social Science Research Network, c2008, [cit. 30. 10. 2015], <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1105398>. Go to original source...
  28. Levitt, A. (1998): The Importance of High Quality Accounting Standards. Accounting Horizons, 1998, roč. 12, č. 1, s. 79-82.
  29. Meeks, G. - Swann, G. M. (2009): Accounting Standards and the Economics of Standards. Accounting and Business Research, 2009, roč. 39, č. 3, s. 191-210. Go to original source...
  30. Mundell, R. A. (1961): A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. The American Economic Review, 1961, roč. 51, č. 4, s. 657-665.
  31. Nobes, C. - Parker, R. H. (2012): Comparative International Accounting. London, Pearson Education, 2012.
  32. Peltzman, S. (1976): Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 1976, roč. 19, č. 2, s. 211-240. Go to original source...
  33. Ramanna, K. - Sletten, E. (2009): Why Do Countries Adopt International Financial Reporting Standards? Working Papers No. 09-102. Harvard, Harvard Business School, 2009. Go to original source...
  34. Ray, K. (2011): One Size Fits All? Costs and Benefits of Uniform Accounting Standards. [on-line], New York, Social Science Research Network, c2011, [cit. 30. 10. 2015], <http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1940696>. Go to original source...
  35. Sunder, S. (1988): Political Economy of Accounting Standards. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1998, roč. 7, č. 1, s. 31-41.
  36. Sunder, S. (2002a): Regulatory Competition among Accounting Standards within and across International Boundaries. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2002, roč. 21, č. 3, s. 219-234. Go to original source...
  37. Sunder, S. (2002b): Regulatory Competition for Low Cost-of-Capital Accounting Rules. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2002, roč. 21, č. 2, s. 147-149. Go to original source...
  38. Sunder, S. (2009): IFRS and the Accounting Consensus. Accounting Horizons, 2009, roč. 23, č. 1, s. 101-111. Go to original source...
  39. Sunder, S. (2011): IFRS Monopoly: The Pied Piper of Financial Reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 2011, roč. 41, č. 3, s. 291-306. Go to original source...
  40. Sunder, S. - Jamal, K. (2007): Monopoly or Competition: Standard Setting in the Private and Public Sector. [on-line], New York, Social Science Research Network, c2011, [cit. 30. 10. 2015], <http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1075705>. Go to original source...
  41. Tarca, A. (2012): The Case for Global Accounting Standards: Arguments and Evidence. [on-line], New York, Social Science Research Network, c2012, [cit. 30. 10. 2015], <http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2204889>. Go to original source...
  42. U. S. SEC (2014): U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2014-2018. [on-line], Washington D. C., U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission, c2014, [cit. 30. 10. 2015]. <www.sec.gov/about/sec-strategic-plan-2014-2018.pdf>.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.