Český finanční a účetní časopis 2023(1):5-23 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cfuc.579

Use of SASB standards for ESG reporting in Europe: Empirical analysis

Richard Stiebal
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Fakulta financí a účetnictví, katedra finančního účetnictví a auditingu, Praha

This article focuses on non-financial reporting under SASB standards in Europe andis primarily motivated by the development of new ESG reporting frameworks,namely the European Sustainability Reporting Standards under Directive (EU)2022/2464 and Sustainability Disclosure Standards within IFRS. The articleexamines a sample of 110 European companies from various industries in terms ofthe degree of compliance with the requirements of the SASB standards. Usinga document analysis of non-financial reports and a set of double-level metrics, thescope and relevance of published non-financial information is assessed. It is found that European companies largely meet the requirements of SASB standards.Information about the environmental matters is published to the greatest extent. Nosignificant effect of the sector to which the company belongs on the scope ofpublished information is found.

Keywords: CSR; Double materiality; ESG reporting; SASB standards.
JEL classification: M14, Q56

Received: July 6, 2023; Revised: July 6, 2023; Accepted: August 22, 2023; Published: December 30, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Stiebal, R. (2023). Use of SASB standards for ESG reporting in Europe: Empirical analysis. Czech Financial and Accounting Journal2023(1), 5-23. doi: 10.18267/j.cfuc.579
Download citation

References

  1. ADAMS, C. A., A. ALHAMOOD, X. HE, J. TIAN, L. WANG a Y. WANG, 2021. The double-materiality concept: Application and issue. Online. Dostupné z: GRI, https://www.globalreporting.org/media/jrbntbyv/griwhitepaper-publications.pdf. [citováno 2023-06-10].
  2. ALI, W., J. G. FRYNAS a Z. MAHMOOD, 2017. Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Vol. 24, iss. 4, s. 273-294. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1410. Go to original source...
  3. BAUMÜLLER, J., a K. SOPP, 2022. Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: review, outlook and implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. Vol. 23, iss. 1, s. 8-28. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-04-2021-0114. Go to original source...
  4. BOSE, S., 2020. Evolution of ESG Reporting Frameworks. In: D. C. ESTY a T. CORT (eds.). Values at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, s. 13-33. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55613-6_2. Go to original source...
  5. BUSCO, C., C. CONSOLANDI, R. G. ECCLES, E SOFRA, 2020. A Preliminary Analysis of SASB Reporting: Disclosure Topics, Financial Relevance, and the Financial Intensity of ESG Materiality. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. Vol. 32, iss. 2, s. 117-125. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12411. Go to original source...
  6. CLARK, C., 1940. The Conditions of Economic Progress. London: MacMillan and Co. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.2307/2225658. Go to original source...
  7. DRAGOMIR, V. D., 2010. Environmentally sensitive disclosures and financial performance in a European setting. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. Vol. 6, iss. 3, s. 359-388. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1108/18325911011075222. Go to original source...
  8. EUROPEAN FINANCIAL REPORTING ADVISORY GROUP (EFRAG), 2022. First Set of draft ESRS. Online. Dostupné z: https://www.efrag.org/lab6. [citováno 2023-06-09].
  9. EVROPSKÁ KOMISE, 2014. Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2014/95/EU ze dne 22. října 2014 , škterou se mění směrnice 2013/34/EU, pokud jde o uvádění nefinančních informací a informací týkajících se rozmanitosti některými velkými podniky a skupinami. Online. Úřední věstník Evropské unie L 330/2014. Sv. 57, s. 1-9. Dostupné z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj. [citováno 2023-06-09].
  10. EVROPSKÁ KOMISE, 2019a. Sdělení komise: Pokyny pro vykazování nefinančních informací: dodatek o vykazování informací souvisejících se změnou klimatu (2019/C 209/01). Online. Úřední věstník Evropské unie C 209/2019. Sv. 62, s. 1-30. Dostupné z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/CS/TXT/PDF/?uri=O J:C:2019:209:FULL&from=EN. [citováno 2023-06-09].
  11. EVROPSKÁ KOMISE, 2019b. Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) 2019/2088 ze dne 27. listopadu 2019 o zveřejňování informací souvisejících
  12. s udržitelností v odvětví finančních služeb. Online. Úřední věstník Evropské unie
  13. L 317/2019. Roč. 62, s. 1-6. Dostupné z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/2088/oj. [citováno 2023-06-09].
  14. EVROPSKÁ KOMISE, 2022. Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) 2022/2464 ze dne 14. prosince 2022, kterou se mění nařízení (EU) č. 537/2014, směrnice 2004/109/ES, směrnice 2006/43/ES a směrnice 2013/34/EU, pokud jde
  15. o podávání zpráv podniků o udržitelnosti. Online. Úřední věstník Evropské unie
  16. L 322/2022. Roč. 65, s. 15-80. Dostupné z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/24 64/oj. [citováno 2023-06-09].
  17. FAHAD, P., a K. B. NIDHEESH, 2021. Determinants of CSR disclosure: an evidence from India. Journal of Indian Business Research. Vol. 13, iss. 1, s. 110-133. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-06-2018-0171. Go to original source...
  18. FISHER, A. G. B., 1939. Production, primary, secondary and tertiary. Economic Record. Vol. 15, iss. 1, s. 24-38. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1939.tb01015.x. Go to original source...
  19. FOURASTIÉ, J., 1945. L'Économie française dans le monde [Francouzská ekonomika ve světě]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  20. GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE (GRI), 2022. The materiality madness: why definitions matter. Online. The GRI Perspective. Dostupné z: https://www.globalreporting.org/media/r2oojx53/gri-perspective-the-materiality-madness.pdf. [citováno 2023-06-09].
  21. GUILLOT, J., a J. HALES, 2021. Materiality: The Word that Launched a Thousand Debates. Online. SASB. Dostupné z: https://sasb.org/blog/materiality-the-word-that-launched-a-thousand-debates/. [citováno 2023-06-10].
  22. HALES, J., 2018. Global Issues Call for Global Standards. Online. SASB. Dostupné z: https://sasb.org/blog/global-issues-call-for-global-standards/. [citováno 2023-06-10].
  23. HORVÁTH, P., et al., 2017. Status Quo and Future Development of Sustainability Reporting in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of East European Management Studies. Vol. 22, iss. 2, s. 221-243. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2017-2-221. Go to original source...
  24. CHENG, S., K. Z. LIN a W. WONG, 2016. Corporate social responsibility reporting and firm performance: evidence from China. Journal of Management & Governance. Vol. 20, no. 3, s. 503-526. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-015-9309-1. Go to original source...
  25. IFRS FOUNDATION, 2022. IFRS Foundation completes consolidation with Value Reporting Foundation. Online. Dostupné z: https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2022/08/ifrs-foundation-completes-consolidation-with-value-reporting-foundation/. [citováno 2023-06-09].
  26. INTERNATIONAL INTEGRATED REPORTING COUNCIL (IIRC), 2020. An Integrated Approach to Materiality. Online. Dostupné z: https://relatointegradobras il.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Day-1-15.00-An-integrated-approach-to-materiality.pdf. [citováno 2023-06-09].
  27. KHAN, M., A. HASSAN, C. HARRISON a H. TARBERT, 2020. CSR reporting: a review of research and agenda for future research. Management Research Review. Vol. 43, iss. 11, s. 1395-1419. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-02-2019-0073. Go to original source...
  28. ORGANIZACE PRO HOSPODÁŘSKOU SPOLUPRÁCI A ROZVOJ (OECD), 2008. OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms. Online. OECD Publishing, Paris. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264055087-en. [citováno 2023-06-11]. Go to original source...
  29. PIZZI, S., S. PRINCIPALE a E. DE NUCCIO, 2022. Material sustainability information and reporting standards. Exploring the differences between GRI and SASB. Meditari Accountancy Research. Vol. ahead of print, no. ahead of print. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-11-2021-1486. Go to original source...
  30. QIU, Y., A. SHAUKAT a R. THARYAN, 2016. Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review. Vol. 48, iss. 1, s. 102-116. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014. 10.007. Go to original source...
  31. REVERTE, C., 2009. Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 88, no. 2, s. 351-366. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9968-9. Go to original source...
  32. SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (SASB), 2020. SASB Conceptual Framework: Exposure Draft. Online. Dostupné z: https://sasb.org /wp-content/uploads/2021/07/PCP-package_vF.pdf. [citováno 2023-06-09].
  33. SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (SASB), 2022. SASB standard-setting archive. Industry Research Briefs. Online. Dostupné z: https://sasb.org/standards/archive/. [citováno 2023-06-11].
  34. SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (SASB), 2023. Companies reporting with SASB Standards. Online. Dostupné z: https://sasb.org/company-use/sasb-reporters/. [citováno 2023-06-01].
  35. TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES (TCFD), 2017. Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Online. Dostupné z: https://assets.bbhub.io/com pany/sites/60/2021/10/FINAL-2017-TCFD-Report.pdf. [citováno 2023-06-09].
  36. TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES (TCFD), 2022. 2022 Status Report. Online. Dostupné z: https://assets.bbhub.io/co mpany/sites/60/2022/10/2022-TCFD-Status-Report.pdf. [citováno 2023-06-09].
  37. VIGNEAU, L., M. HUMPHREYS a J. MOON, 2015. How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 131, no. 2, s. 469-486. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.